Developer guide

Overview

This package contains manually written and autogenerated files. We store only sources in the repository. To get the full package, one need to generate missing package files.

Layout of the cvat-sdk directory

  • gen/ - generator files
  • cvat_sdk/ - Python package root
  • cvat_sdk/api_client - autogenerated low-level package code
  • cvat_sdk/core - high-level package code

How to generate package code

  1. Install generator dependencies:

    pip install -r cvat-sdk/gen/requirements.txt

  2. Generate package code (call from the package root directory!):

    ./cvat-sdk/gen/generate.sh

  3. Install the packages:

    pip install ./cvat-sdk
pip install ./cvat-cli

    If you want to edit package files, install them with -e:

    pip install -e ./cvat-sdk
pip install -e ./cvat-cli

How to edit templates

If you want to edit templates, obtain them from the generator first:

docker run --rm -v $PWD:/local \
    openapitools/openapi-generator-cli author template \
        -o /local/generator_templates -g python

Then, you can copy the modified version of the template you need into the gen/templates/openapi-generator/ directory.

Relevant links:

How to test

API client tests are integrated into REST API tests in /tests/python/rest_api and SDK tests are placed next to them in /tests/python/sdk. To execute, run:

pytest tests/python/rest_api tests/python/sdk

SDK API design decisions

The generated ApiClient code is modified from what openapi-generator does by default. Changes are mostly focused on better user experience - including better usage patterns and simpler/faster ways to achieve results.

Modifications

  • Added Python type annotations for return types and class members. This change required us to implement a custom post-processing script, which converts generated types into correct type annotations. The types generated by default are supposed to work with the API implementation (parameter validation and parsing), but they are not applicable as type annotations (they have incorrect syntax). Custom post-processing allowed us to make these types correct type annotations. Other possible solutions:

    • There is the python-experimental API generator, which may solve some issues, but it is unstable and requires python 3.9. Our API works with 3.7, which is the lowest supported version now.
    • Custom templates - partially works, but only in limited cases (model fields). It’s very hard to maintain the template code and logic for this. Only if checks and for loops are available in mustache templates, which is not enough for annotation generation.

  • Separate APIs are embedded into the general APIClient class. Now we have:

    with ApiClient(config) as api_client:
  result1 = api_client.foo_api.operation1()
  result2 = api_client.bar_api.operation2()

    This showed to be more convenient than the default:

    with ApiClient(config) as api_client:
  foo_api = FooApi(api_client)
  result1 = foo_api.operation1()
  result2 = foo_api.operation2()

  bar_api = BarApi(api_client)
  result3 = bar_api.operation3()
  result4 = bar_api.operation4()

    This also required custom post-processing. Operation Ids are supposed to be unique in the OpenAPI / Swagger specification. Therefore, we can’t generate such schema on the server, nor we can’t expect it to be supported in the API generator.

  • Operations have IDs like <api>/<method>_<object>. This also showed to be more readable and more natural than DRF-spectacular’s default <api>/<object>_<method>.

  • Server operations have different types for input and output values. While it can be expected that an endpoint with POST/PUT methods available (like create or partial_update) has the same type for input and output (because it looks natural), it also leads to the situation, in which there are lots of read-/write-only fields, and it becomes hard for understanding. This clear type separation is supposed to make it simpler for users.

  • Added cookie management in the ApiClient class.

  • Added interface classes for models to simplify class member usage and lookup.

  • Dicts can be passed into API methods and model constructors instead of models. They are automatically parsed as models. In the original implementation, the user is required to pass a Configuration object each time, which is clumsy and adds little sense.